<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>2009 Subaru WRX 265 &#187; BMW vs WRX</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wrx265.com/tag/bmw-vs-wrx/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wrx265.com</link>
	<description>The 2009 WRX 265 experience from WRX 265 owner.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 14:57:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>More Subaru WRX 265 0 &#8211; 60 Stats</title>
		<link>http://www.wrx265.com/2008/11/12/more-subaru-wrx-265-0-60-stats/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wrx265.com/2008/11/12/more-subaru-wrx-265-0-60-stats/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 17:34:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Samer Forzley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Drive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WRX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2009 subaru 0 - 60]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2009 wrx 0 60]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2009 wrx performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BMW M3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BMW vs WRX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Subaru]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[subaru wrx]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[subaru wrx 265]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wrx 0 - 60]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wrx performance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wrx265.wordpress.com/?p=77</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks to Phil Ingratta who wrote in and sent this info. Thanks Phil for sharing. Here is an article I found on some 0-60 times far better than the ones you have on your site, and I think are more accurate. PHIL 2009 Subaru Impreza Here is sample text "Out at the track, the new [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks to Phil Ingratta who wrote in and sent this info. Thanks Phil for sharing.</p>
<pre>Here is an article I found on some 0-60 times far better than
the ones you have on your site, and I think are more accurate.  PHIL

<a href="http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/hatchbacks/112_0810_2009_subaru_impreza_wrx_test/index.html" target="_blank">2009 Subaru Impreza </a>

Here is sample text

"<span><span class="clr1 article_body" style="font-size:12px;">Out at the track, the new and improved WRX launches hard; all four tires
spin as the car leaps forward as if it were rear-ended by a bus. A mere
1.6 sec pass before 30 mph is reached, a time on par with the new <a href="http://www.motortrend.com/cars/2009/bmw/m3/index.html">BMW M3</a>
and <a href="http://www.motortrend.com/cars/2009/cadillac/cts/index.html">Cadillac CTS</a>-v. Sixty mph comes in 4.8 sec, and the five-door, five-passenger hatchback
we tested covered a quarter mile in 13.5 sec at 101.1 mph. That's near
a second faster than last year's model and just a tenth slower than the
2008 STI. Consider the $10,000 difference between the base WRX and the"
homologated rally car, and you'll be asking yourself, "STI why?"</span></span></pre>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wrx265.com/2008/11/12/more-subaru-wrx-265-0-60-stats/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

